Was Syscoin [SYS] hacked? Team clarifies the recent confusion related to its trading activity

Home » News » Was Syscoin [SYS] hacked? Team clarifies the recent confusion related to its trading activity
July 6, 2018 by
Was Syscoin [SYS] hacked? Team clarifies the recent confusion related to its trading activity

On July 3, 2018, Syscoin tweeted stating that atypical blockchain activity was noted from their side and also they request the exchanges to stop all $SYS deposit or withdrawal for that day.

This caused a lot of complication in the community with speculations regarding the hack. Records stated that a person billion Syscoin was mined from a single block, regardless of the overall supply being around 888 million. In a recent message on Tool, Syscoin group claimed that they take its security really seriously which’s why the momentary cease on deposit/withdrawal from exchanges was introduced.

See likewise: Binance suspends trading, withdrawals and also other account features

The group in the blog post pointed out that Syscoin was not hacked, endangered or assaulted, as it was reported. Actually, the truth is “something else totally”. They launched Syscoin 3.0.6 around 10 days earlier. The post stated, “The launch was a necessary update fixing a governance superblock charge calculation insect. Once a superblock with transaction fees was hit, it would certainly not verify customers that had not moved onto the necessary upgrade.”

On July 3, a massive rise in the cost and also trading volume of Syscoin was kept in mind. Prior to the price activities on Binance, their group detected big buy walls across exchanges and also saw some abnormalities. They saw that the blocks that are being refined were not including purchases on a regular basis. Additionally, masternodes were expiring with the mining problem going down due to big miners not extracting with their ASICs.

See likewise: The Exponential Development of Syscoin (SYS) Scents Fishy: SYS Cost Analysis

A Superblock was produced at around 1:00 PM PST, as well as they specified that it was “expected and planned for weeks in advance”, creating some miner nodes to stop. Post this, numerous large mining pools set cost policies that were more than the coin’s default rate. So, the transactions where the standards were not pleased, they became “supported” in the mempool of the chain. Continuous mining by the miners with lower fee rates with purchases being processed in batches, making it appear “larger than normal quantities of Syscoin to be negotiated in a solitary block”.

shekar

A mechanical engineer turned journalist, Shekar takes a keen interest in the study and analysis of cryptocurrencies and blockchain strategy. With the cryptocurrency world blooming in the recent days, he finds great interest in monitoring their growth and gathering every possible piece of information about them. He works as a crypto-journalist for the website Peopleperbitcoin.

© Copyright 2018. People Per Bitcoin. Designed by Space-Themes.com.